The Christian Institute News Release
For immediate release
Thursday 16th May 2002

House of Commons votes 288 to 133 to allow unmarried couples to adopt
MPs ignore best interests of children in adoption vote

Reacting to today's adoption vote in the Commons, Simon Calvert, Deputy Director of The Christian Institute said:

"This vote shows that MPs are out of touch with ordinary people. When it comes to gay adoption for example British Social Attitudes found that 84% of the public oppose adoption by homosexuals. But in a clamour to be politically correct, MPs have put gay rights before the best interests of children."

"Allowing unmarried couples to adopt is a massive change in adoption law. When it comes to adoption by heterosexual couples who are living together it is plainly wrong to place a needy child in care into a relationship which is at least six times more likely to break up than a married relationship. These kids have been through enough instability already. Why should two adults who have deliberately chosen not to commit to each other be allowed to jointly commit to a vulnerable child?"

"This vote also allows adoption by gay couples. It is wrong to deliberately deprive a child of a male and female role model. This will not increase the pool of potential adopters. Only 0.2 per cent of households are same-sex couples and only a fraction of those want to adopt. Allowing gay adoption is more about pleasing gay rights groups than about increasing opportunities for adoption."

Adoption Facts:

  • At the moment only married couples can jointly adopt children. Some 95% of all adoptions are with married couples with 5% by single people (who are also legally permitted to adopt).
  • The Government Adoption Law Review recommended that the law should stay as it is, but amendments have been tabled by backbench MPs which allow homosexual couples and unmarried couples to adopt children.
  • Gay adoption deprives children of a mother or father
  • 84 per cent of the public are against allowing homosexual men to adopt.
  • Only 0.2 per cent of households are same-sex couples. Allowing gay adoption is more about normalising homosexual behaviour than about increasing opportunities for adoption.
  • Same-sex relationships are much more unstable and short-lived than heterosexual relationships.
  • Even some researchers in favour of gay adoption admit that children raised by homosexual parents are more likely to be homosexual.
  • Despite repeated assertions to the contrary, studies indicate significant differences between homosexual and heterosexual parenting outcomes for children. One of the largest pro-gay studies found that children raised by homosexual couples had the worst outcomes in terms of education and social adjustment. Children raised by cohabiting couples were better, but those raised by married couples had the best outcomes.
  • Gender confusion seems to be rife with daughters of lesbian mothers.
  • Pro-gay studies commonly ditch the most basic research methods:
    • They fail to test any hypothesis or use a proper control group.
    • Sample sizes are so small that no deductions can be made.
    • One study which was headlined as "Gay men make better fathers" did not even have any children in the study but merely asked opinions.
  • Pro-gay sociologists argue that gay adoption should go ahead despite the lack of evidence in support.

Unmarried adoption denies children stability and security

  • Most European Countries have the same law as the UK permitting only married couples and single people to adopt.
  • Cohabiting couples have deliberately chosen to live in a relationship that gives them the complete freedom to leave that relationship. But children need to be raised within a stable, secure environment.
  • Research shows that the average length of cohabitation is two years at which point the couple tend to marry or split up. Cohabitation is essentially a transient state.
  • Some 60% of cohabitees go on to marry, but of those who don't marry 83% will break up within 10 years.
  • If cohabiting couples have a child, they are at least six times more likely to split up than married couples.
  • One of the largest family studies published in 2000 concluded that children raised by cohabiting couples were much more likely to become part of a one parent family than those raised by a married couple.
  • The largest and most detailed British study on sexual attitudes concluded that: "… it is striking that cohabitation does not appear to exert any strong influence on monogamy".

In 1998 the then Home Secretary, Jack Straw MP, said that he was against gay adoption because "We should not see children as trophies". He argued that the evidence showed marriage is the best environment in which to raise children.

In November 2001, Health Minister Jacqui Smith, admitted: "The adoption law review, when considering this issue, concluded that joint adoption should remain limited to married couples on the grounds that adoption by a married couple was more likely to provide the stability and security that the child needed because married couples have made a joint, publicly recognised, legal commitment to each other.

- ENDS -

For more information contact : Simon Calvert on : 0191 281 5664

Note for Editors:
In rare cases adoption by a single person can have benefits for a child who finds it difficult to relate to two carers. Such cases include children who have been abused or who have had multiple foster placements.

The Christian Institute, Registered Charity No 100 4774 seeks to promote the Christian faith in the UK
Registered Office : 26 Jesmond Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4PQ