|
House-sharers
excluded from Government partnership plans
Two old ladies who live together must pretend to be lesbians if they
want to overcome the legal hardships of their living arrangements. The
Government’s ‘civil partnership’ Bill gives homosexual
couples sweeping new legal rights and privileges. But the plans exclude
family members who live together and other house-sharers. The Bill has
its second reading in the House of Commons tomorrow (Tuesday 12 October).
The Government says the Bill will help same-sex couples overcome the
legal hardships they face because they cannot marry. Legal hardships
include not having next of kin rights, joint pension rights, and tenancy
succession rights and not having exemptions from inheritance tax and
Capital Gains Tax. The Christian Institute points out that there are
other people who live together long-term who face the same legal hardships
because they cannot marry – for example, two sisters or a son
who looks after his infirm father (for more examples see below).
The 2001 census revealed only 80,000 people living in a same-sex couple
household. But there were 4.6 million people, excluding students, living
in a non-couple household, 59 times as many people than in same-sex
couple households.
On 24 June, the House of Lords passed an amendment to the Civil Partnership
Bill that extended the scheme to close family members who have been
living together as adults for twelve years or more. The Government opposes
the amendment and will seek to overturn it in the Commons. The Christian
Institute opposes the Bill on principle, but believes that if it goes
ahead it should apply to close family members who have been living together
long-term.
Colin Hart, Director of The Christian Institute, said today: “If
the Government genuinely wants to help house-sharers who cannot marry
to overcome legal hardships, why should same-sex couple be the only
ones to benefit? Why should gays and lesbians be first in the queue?
The reality is, the Government wants to give special legal recognition
to homosexual relationships. This is ‘gay marriage’ in all
but name. It is appalling that two old ladies will have to pretend to
be lesbians if they want to take advantage of the scheme. If the Government
is determined to go ahead with its plans, it should be consistent and
not discriminate against other house-sharers.”
For
more information contact: Mike Judge on 0191 281 5664
|
The
Christian Institute, Registered Charity No 100 4774 seeks to promote
the Christian faith in the UK
Registered Office: First Floor, Cathedral Buildings, Dean Street, Newcastle
upon Tyne, NE1 1PG
Examples
of house-sharers excluded from the Government’s civil partnerships
scheme:
-
A daughter gives up her well-paid job to care for her elderly and
infirm mother for 15 years. She moves into her mother’s London
home where the family has lived for generations. Her mother dies and
the daughter inherits. She is then faced with a large bill for inheritance
tax, which forces her to sell the family home and move out of London.
- An
elderly uncle moves into his niece’s house. He is dependent
on her for everything. The niece has a routine operation, but dies
owing to the negligence of the anaesthetist. The uncle is unable to
sue the Health Authority, because they were not in a registered partnership.
- Two
sisters live together throughout their lives in a rented house. They
share their possessions. One has a public sector pension. She dies,
but her surviving sister can gain nothing from the pension.
- Two
elderly gentlemen, one of them disabled, live together for 15 years
in a rented property, the one caring for the other. They do not register
as partners, not wishing to be seen as lovers. The disabled man dies.
His friend is forcibly evicted from the rented property, having no
status as ‘partner’ or ‘family member’.
-
Two spinsters live together for 40 years but are excluded from the
scheme, on account of their unwillingness to register as a lesbian
couple. Twenty years ago, one of the spinsters bought the council
house they were living in. Since then, it has increased in value beyond
the inheritance tax threshold. The spinster who owns the house dies
and the other has to sell the home to meet the tax bill.
|
|